Commentart
Regarding Elmasry at University of Waterloo
Jan Narveson,University of Waterloo
I
have been somewhat acquainted with Dr. Elmasry over the years. I'm
rather sorry
he's got himself into this mess, but in another way, I'm very glad, for
it will
help clear the air - a lot, I hope. I don't think Elmasry REALLY meant
to say
what he is said to have said - whatever he did say. The interesting,
and
serious, point is that what he said could, without grave injustice, be
so
readily interpreted as implying just
what the newspapers
did trumpet across the land. This has forced him to retract - except
'forced'
of course is not literally correct. What is correct is that the plain
evil of
the view ascribed to him wasn't obvious enough to him when he said what
he did
to keep him from saying it. I hope that from now on, the air will be
clearer.
We
know that in too many places in the world, coming right out and saying,
in so
many words, just what he is alleged to have said would be thought
perfectly OK,
and even greeted with pretty general enthusiasm.
There
is little hope for peace in the middle east, or really anywhere, so
long as
people are ready to think that such things are
"OK." It does not
take
a lot of
thought to see why. Wars are bad enough, but "wars" in which the
distinction
between combatants and noncombatants is simply ignored
by one side are
far, far worse. Dr. Elmasry surely knows
that.
He
should also surely know that the basis for our common human morality
has
NOTHING to do with Islam in particular. It is independent of religion,
and must
be understood to be so. Nobody should be allowed to get away with
proclaiming
that it is only wrong to murder people because Jehova, or Allah, or any
of the
indefinite number of candidates for a similar position, just happened
to feel
like taking that view. And the sooner this is generally understood, the
better.
Should
professors of chemical engineering be fired for fall afoul of that? No.
But professors of anything, need to learn
this
conceptual lesson, and it would not be a bad idea for universities to
afford
occasion for the lesson to be broadcast and emphasized, fairly
frequently.
Newsletter, January 2005 -Text